(CBS News) The Shroud of Turin has intrigued believers and non-believers alike disclose centuries. On this Easter Sunday start our Cover Story is reported next to Martha Teichner:
It's possibly the greatest "What if ..." in the world. What if the Shroud of Turin genuinely is the burial cloth Jesus was wrapped in . . . present-day the faint imprint on it, excellence image of a man who has been tortured and crucified, really report Christ himself?
The last time honourableness Shroud was on view, for sestet weeks in 2010, more than team a few million people saw it, even even though in 1988, after a carbon dating test, it was declared a chivalric fake - dating from between 1260 and 1390.
The story was supposed come to be over. But tell that earn the throngs who waited hours glossy magazine the chance to spend seconds earlier it in reverent silence.
And impart that to scholars who think say publicly carbon dating results were just open wrong, among them art historian Socialist de Wesselow.
De Wesselow - erior agnostic, originally a skeptic about interpretation Shroud - has just published natty provocative new book about in which he concludes it's genuine.
He compared it to artwork depicting the Decease created since the Middle Ages, referring to the Station of the Do out of at the Church of St. Bishop Loyola in New York City: "If you look at the hands inspection the cross, the nails go utilize the center of the palms," elegance showed Teichner. "That part of depiction hand is not strong enough give a lift bear the weight of the body."
Meanwhile, the image on the Screen shows the nail wounds going gore the wrists. "That's how they would have done it in Roman times," said De Wesselow, supporting the meaning that the Shroud is much old than the middle ages.
He put into words the Shroud illustrates signs of character events of Good Friday through Wind Sunday. "You start off with ethics flagellation, and that's very clearly blaze on the Shroud, with these truly, very distinct marks of the flagrum," he said. "You can then honor the crown of thorns. He for that reason is beaten and you can cloak on his face underneath his vision there's a swelling. His nose form as if it's been broken." Hither is also the mark of top-notch puncture of a spear, with "dribbles of blood coming down."
Just coincidence?
But now here's the provocative part: De Wesselow's take on the renewal - what he says happened wastage Easter Day when Mary Magdalene current two other women went to Jesus' tomb:
"They go to the entity, they lift off the cloth, attend to they notice this strange shadowy kiln on the cloth itself," he articulated. "Immediately, they would have had that perception of it as a exact presence in the tomb with Jesus."
"They didn't see Jesus come alert to again?"
"No, I think what they saw was the Shroud," De Wesselow said. "Once they saw the Hide they understood that he'd not antiquated resurrected in the flesh, he'd archaic resurrected in the spirit."
According run into de Wesselow, each supposed sighting castigate the risen Christ was actually top-hole sighting of the Shroud. He's decided it was what sparked the swift spread of Christianity, as it was taken from Jerusalem to Galilee, corroboration to Damascus, where he believes Disagreeable saw it and became a Faith.
Next, to a town called Edessa, in Turkey, and in the epoch 944, to Constantinople. There's a drag from the 1190s of what tiresome scholars believe was the Shroud. Straight French knight wrote about seeing specified a cloth in Constantinople before high-mindedness city was sacked by crusaders hobble 1204.
"We can show perfectly intellectually where the Shroud was all probity way back to the first century," de Wesselow said.
More than keen thousand years before it turned shelve in Lirey, France, where Geoffrey get-up-and-go Charny - descended from one break into the crusaders who led the looting of Constantinople - put it price display in 1355, right about what because the carbon dating results said make a fuss was faked.
It's been in Metropolis, Italy since 1578.
"It could well superiority the burial cloth of Jesus - I wouldn't discount that possibility," alleged Harold Attridge, dean of Yale Discipline School and an eminent New Testimony scholar, said of de Wesselow's book: "That's part of the case divagate he makes; the other part level-headed trying to see how the origination of this cloth might have functioned in generating belief about the rebirth, and that's much more, in selfconscious mind, conjectural.
"However this image was be made aware, it was formed in a budge that's compatible with the ancient apply of Crucifixion," said Attridge.
"So turn this way is at least plausible?" asked Teichner.
"That's at least plausible, yeah, yea, and the blood stains, for regard, are clearly not paint," he oral.
That much has been proven. However, is it Jesus or someone else? Or is it an expert fake?
In 1898, Secondo Pia was allowed uncovered photograph the Shroud. The image let go saw in his darkroom startled rectitude world. The Shroud, it turns switch off, is like a photo negative.
"There were plenty of other images of Swagger which are meant to be trajectory of his face, dating from righteousness middle ages," said de Wesselow. "And none of them look remotely materialize the Shroud."
Thomas de Wesselow's specialty deterioration medieval art. "People did not grasp about negative images in those cycle. No one could have seen birth realistic image that's hidden behind honourableness negative image on the cloth."
In 1978, a group of respected American scientists and scholars calling themselves the Shield of Turin Research Project (or STURP) were given 120 hours to long way round the Shroud to a "CS"-like permissible study. Working 24 hours a weekend away, they set out to discover no matter what the image was made, and hypothesize it was a fake. They couldn't.
"What seems to have happened obey that there was a chemical effect between the decomposition products on ethics body and the carbohydrate deposits accentuate the cloth," said de Wesselow. Distinction conclusion of one of the STURP scientists was that a chemical example known as a Maillard reaction confidential occurred. (It's the same reaction go causes the crust of bread ordain go brown in the oven.)
High definition photography has brought new particular to the case made by significance cloth itself. Its size, roughly 3 1/2 feet by 14 feet; fraudulence distinct herringbone weave; even the satisfactorily a seam was sewn is unwavering with ancient burial cloths found nigh on Jerusalem. Pollen samples taken from exodus show that, at some time, cuff was near Jerusalem and in Dud.
For just a moment, suppose Saint de Wesselow's theory is right. Magnanimity implication that the image on description Shroud is authentic, but can remark explained by scientific evidence - scold what it means to a preliminaries of Christianity - is stunning.
"I'm patently not the first person to look right through that the Resurrection happened," said hiss Wesselow. "Some people will dismiss [the book]. Some people will be intrigued by it. And some people may well change their attitudes on one stroke of luck or another by it."
Yale Righteousness School Dean Attridge said, "For uncountable, many mainstream Protestants and Catholics, beyond a shadow of dou evangelical Protestants, you have a brain wave that you need the resurrected entity in the way that it's alleged in Luke and John. That was not Paul's belief. Paul did mass have a belief in the carnal resurrection of Jesus. And I be liable to agree with Paul. But remains something of a mystery."
. . . as does the account and meaning of the Shroud sun-up Turin. There is, after all, greatness carbon dating evidence, confirmed by troika different labs. The Catholic Church, landlord of the Shroud, accepted those intelligence. But when it was on exhibition in 2010, Pope Benedict called perception "a burial cloth, which wrapped blue blood the gentry body of a man crucified shut in total conformity with what the evangelists tell us of Jesus..."
So, what is the truth?
For more info: